<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photography Tutorial : Star Trail Basics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adcuz.co.uk/2009/04/05/photography-tutorial-star-trail-basics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adcuz.co.uk/2009/04/05/photography-tutorial-star-trail-basics/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to night photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:43:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adcuz</title>
		<link>http://adcuz.co.uk/2009/04/05/photography-tutorial-star-trail-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-36657</link>
		<dc:creator>Adcuz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adcuz.co.uk/?p=353#comment-36657</guid>
		<description>It depends really, I often find that the traditional method of single longer exposures are much easier. Mainly because everything is handled in camera which is my preference. Stacking is very good when you find that light pollution is too great to get star trails on a single exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends really, I often find that the traditional method of single longer exposures are much easier. Mainly because everything is handled in camera which is my preference. Stacking is very good when you find that light pollution is too great to get star trails on a single exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chitrang</title>
		<link>http://adcuz.co.uk/2009/04/05/photography-tutorial-star-trail-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-36645</link>
		<dc:creator>Chitrang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adcuz.co.uk/?p=353#comment-36645</guid>
		<description>Which one produce better reults? I haven&#039;t tried yet probably I will try today or tommorow both ways</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which one produce better reults? I haven&#8217;t tried yet probably I will try today or tommorow both ways</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adcuz</title>
		<link>http://adcuz.co.uk/2009/04/05/photography-tutorial-star-trail-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-36644</link>
		<dc:creator>Adcuz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adcuz.co.uk/?p=353#comment-36644</guid>
		<description>Yep, this is the later tutorial is a different technique. This is for the &quot;traditional&quot; way (star trails with just one exposure and no extra software). The later tutorial is about stacking multiple exposures to produce star trails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, this is the later tutorial is a different technique. This is for the &#8220;traditional&#8221; way (star trails with just one exposure and no extra software). The later tutorial is about stacking multiple exposures to produce star trails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
